Evaluating content requires a structured approach. Teams should use consistent methods to assess both human- and AI-generated content objectively.
This guide outlines key categories for technical writing in regulatory submissions for therapeutics. Each category includes example metrics and a scoring rubric to support consistency across reviewers. The metrics are semi-quantitative and explainable. While they may not apply to all content types, they provide a practical framework for evaluation.
Teams should apply the rubric to the smallest logical unit of writing, such as an individual study summary. Reviewing multiple examples helps improve consistency and accuracy.
